Coming to my hood the North-West. It is very disappointing that this quad is nearly empty :(
anyway we have some alliances here.
Vanguard
Massacre
T.L.S
J.W.
![]()
The special thing here is that we have 4 completely different alliances. But in my opinion the Janners Way (J.W.) shouldnt really count because they have members in 3 quadrants which means that they won't dominate any area together.. I am sure they will fall apart in all quadrants as one as the first alliances in uk4. T.L.S is that kind of alliance which does not need a longer time to make 3 confeds, a war and trying to get a maximum of players in their rows. In my eyes they try to dominate with mass but they confed with 3 alliances from the NE and already have an officiel war with Massacre. I personally doubt, that they are winning. Vanguard is the extreme opposite of it, we recruit very very selective, and over the half of the accounts are at least dual accounts, we have the best croppers but our weaknesses are that we are only 15 accounts and spreaded. Anyway we decided to wait for developments before we decide about politics completely.
A new day and a new member for Massacre. The development of that alliance is disappointing in my eyes. They seemed like a quality alliance (and they still have quality players) but in the last time their recruiter seems to try to full their rows with writing every member of J.W., T.L.S or N.W.A.
I could believe Massacre will be a favourite because they try to go both ways, quality and quantity, but I think quality always getting lost with so many accounts and the conditions to join massacre sadly does not seems to be very high here. I think it is worth to have a look on how long T.L.S will stand that "war" (I am not sure if a lot of cats are running here) against Massacre.
anyway we have some alliances here.
Vanguard
Massacre
T.L.S
J.W.
The special thing here is that we have 4 completely different alliances. But in my opinion the Janners Way (J.W.) shouldnt really count because they have members in 3 quadrants which means that they won't dominate any area together.. I am sure they will fall apart in all quadrants as one as the first alliances in uk4. T.L.S is that kind of alliance which does not need a longer time to make 3 confeds, a war and trying to get a maximum of players in their rows. In my eyes they try to dominate with mass but they confed with 3 alliances from the NE and already have an officiel war with Massacre. I personally doubt, that they are winning. Vanguard is the extreme opposite of it, we recruit very very selective, and over the half of the accounts are at least dual accounts, we have the best croppers but our weaknesses are that we are only 15 accounts and spreaded. Anyway we decided to wait for developments before we decide about politics completely.
A new day and a new member for Massacre. The development of that alliance is disappointing in my eyes. They seemed like a quality alliance (and they still have quality players) but in the last time their recruiter seems to try to full their rows with writing every member of J.W., T.L.S or N.W.A.
I could believe Massacre will be a favourite because they try to go both ways, quality and quantity, but I think quality always getting lost with so many accounts and the conditions to join massacre sadly does not seems to be very high here. I think it is worth to have a look on how long T.L.S will stand that "war" (I am not sure if a lot of cats are running here) against Massacre.